Fate of Empires…

In 1976 Lieutenant General Sir John Glubb published an essay called “The Fate of Empires”. In it Glubb suggests at least two ideas that are influential today. The first is that all empires have a lifespan of 250 years, which corresponds to about 10 human generations. The second is that empires have six stages.

The lifespan of empires seems to be unaffected by its location or the available technology, which suggests that there is an intrinsic human cause. Glubb calls the six stages of empire:

Age of Pioneers
Age of Conquests
Age of Commerce
Age of Affluence
Age of Intellect
Age of Decadence

The six Ages have specific characteristics. The first few Ages seem to include an adventurous and explorative spirit. During the second Age of Conquests, Glubb says that the “initiative of the original conquerors is maintained – in geographical exploration, for example: pioneering new countries, penetrating new forests, climbing unexplored mountains and sailing uncharted seas.” The third Age of Commerce, “[perpetuates] to some degree the adventurous courage of the Age of Conquests”, as people search for new forms of wealth in “far corners of the earth”.

This adventurous spirit is lost with the Age of Affluence. There is a gradual “decline in courage, enterprise and sense of duty”, with money replacing honour and adventure as the “objective of the best young men”. This loss of adventure is compounded in the Age of Intellect where ambition of the young, “once engaged in the pursuit of adventure and military glory, and then in the desire for the accumulation of wealth, now turns to the acquisition of academic honours”.

Glubb was born in 1897, the son of a British army officer. He spent part of his childhood and schooling in Mauritius and Switzerland, served throughout the First World War, then spent decades in the Middle East, including 17 years commanding the Jordan Arab Legion (effectively the Jordanian army). He was a prolific writer on the Middle East and an Arab scholar. Glubb’s ideas might be coloured by his age (79) when it was published, and by his specific life experience spent in the service of a declining empire.

Initial reactions to the essay included accusations of fatalism. But Glubb was clear that his position was completely the opposite – “The fault, dear Brutus, is not in our stars, but in ourselves that we are underlings”. He observed that the Age of Decadence isn’t physical: European and American explorers brought up in comfort matched the endurance of locals when travelling in inhospitable places; people who emigrate from a decadent society quickly adopt the energy of their new home.

The essay is enduringly popular, partly because of the outstandingly clear prose, but also because of the ideas. Glubb categorises the Roman Empire and Republic as two separate empires – perhaps there are parallels with the more recent British and American empires. Certainly, the Fate of Empires is often cited with anxiety by people concerned about the possible collapse of American power.

Arabian Sands…

Arabian Sands is a classic c20th account of physical endurance by Wilfred Thesiger, one of the great adventurers.

The book describes Thesiger’s travels across the Empty Quarter on the Arabian Peninsula. It was published more than 60 years ago but the writing is understated, with short sentences. This simultaneously makes it feel modern, and is reminiscent of Victorian British travellers who were very matter–of-fact and wrote lots of precise information. His writing style contrasts with his contemporary Eric Newby’s style of comic dialogue and faux-timidity (a style developed further by writers such as Bill Bryson).

Thesiger was substantial, and a model to other adventurers. He was born in Addis Ababa, which perhaps makes him impressed by superficial exoticism than his contemporaries. He came out of the high British Imperial culture (son of the British Consul General in Ethiopia, nephew of a Viceroy of India). He is sometimes seen as an inevitable Victorian explorer. Rory Stewart wrote the introduction to the recent Penguin edition, where he points out that Thesiger was younger than Picasso and Proust, and younger than his fellow Etonians Orwell (who fought for the Communists in Spain) and Aldous Huxley (who was taking drugs in California).

Thesiger had physical courage. He compared himself with British colonial officials who understood the local culture and undertook physical demanding, dangerous journeys without making a fuss about it. Jan Morris said it was “the clean hard matter of physical challenge that inspired [Thesiger], and his rejection of all contemporary palliatives took on a semi-mystical character of renunciation.” Thesiger himself writes: “I would rather be here starving as I was than sitting in a chair, replete with food, listening to the wireless and dependent on cars to take me through Arabia.”

He never stopped travelling – perhaps the aim was punishing travel itself, or exploration. He chose to renounce almost everything for the sake of freedom. Perhaps Stewart is correct that Thesiger’s belief of how a human life should best be lived is what makes him matter as a writer and a man.

Clements Markham…

Clements Markham spent 12 years as President of the Royal Geographic Society, went on several voyages and expeditions in the middle decades of the c19th, and was a driving force behind late Victorian and Edwardian Antarctic exploration. But, was he an adventurer?

Isobel Williams‘ interesting recent talk at the RGS – “Be Inspired: Sir Clements Markham President of the RGS: success or failure?” – discusses his life and career .

As a teenage naval cadet, Markham spent four years on a tour of duty of the Pacific that included the Southern Ocean and Cape Horn, several months in Lima and Valparaiso, as well as Hawaii and Tahiti. He then became the youngest member of an expedition searching for Sir John Franklin’s lost expedition of 1845, which had been trying to force the Northwest Passage (sea route between the Atlantic and Pacific through the Arctic Ocean). After leaving the Navy, he travelled twice to Peru. On his second journey, accompanied by Richard Bruce, he collected cinchona specimens (at that time the only known source of the malarial treatment quinine) and introduced them to India. After his father died, he joined the India Office and married. He later traveled to Abyssinia in 1867, as surveyor and naturalist, on Robert Napier’s expedition. He become a Fellow of the RGS in 1854, Hon Secretary 1863-88, President from 1893-1905, and was active in the Hakluyt Society.

As PRGS, he was very influential on the development of British Antarctic exploration. Captain RF Scott was a protégé of Markham’s throughout Scott’s life. Markham appointed Scott to lead the Discovery expedition to the Antarctic, and his diary entry, on learning of Scott’s death is revealing:

“…heartbreaking to think of Kathleen and Mrs Wilson. Even now I can hardly believe it. There has passed away, if it is really true, a very exceptionally noble Englishman. What struck me was his chivalrous nature in dealing with contemptible self-seekers such as Shackleton and Amundsen. Very rarely have so many great qualities been combined in one man.”

Markham wrote the preface to Scott’s Last Expedition, where he describes Scott as “among the most remarkable men of our time”, a “great leader” with “beauty of…character”. He was also godfather to Scott’s son Peter, who was named after him.

Was Clements Markham adventurous in Bruno Macaes’ sense? Clearly, he was a “great man” in the Victorian mould, with vision and strength of character. He was part of a society that was much more adventurous than today’s, and part of a culture that prized endeavour. It is unclear whether he had an “anxiety that there might be a different lifestyle that is passing you by, just because you aren’t looking for it“. Perhaps introducing cinchona to India, searching for Sir John Franklin’s expedition, and enabling Polar exploration, showed awareness “that we don’t know the answers“.

Adventure is an awareness that we don’t know the answers…

Adventure is inconsistent with liberalism today, according to the Portuguese writer and political thinker Bruno Maçães. In conversation with Tyler Cowen in 2018, he discusses how modern Liberalism implies too much control, that it includes the idea of a life plan. Modern Liberalism presumes that we know all the answers so we can spend lots of time preaching about how to live. In contrast, adventure involves not knowing the answers but looking around! This applies equally to physical adventure.

Politically, adventure has an anxiety that there might be a different lifestyle that is passing you buy just because you aren’t looking for it. This is an anxiety that liberalism lacks. According to Maçães, adventure has disappeared from the European psyche (seen, for example, in the EU’s current resistance to technology). Perhaps this is related to today’s idea that today’s heroes must be either accidental or victims.

Physical adventure is deeply connected to Maçães concept of political adventure: it is more than just ‘having a nice time outside’. Physical adventure involves an awareness that we don’t know the answers, that there are other ways of living, and that control is overrated.

Wind, Sand and Stars…

Wind, Sand and Stars is perhaps the most beautifully written adventure, by Antoine de Saint-Exupery who also wrote The Little Prince

It is autobiographical, describing the author’s experiences piloting planes across the Sahara and the Andes in the 1920s-40s, searching for adventure and for something else undefined.

The writing is lyrical, with lines and images that stay with the reader. It was very popular when first published, in 1939. Literary prizes are always difficult to interpret, but it won both the Grand Prix du roman de l’Académie française and the U.S. National Book Award for Nonfiction. The 1995 translation by William Rees is based on the original French text. The book includes an account of de Saint-Exupery’s crash in the Libyan desert in 1935, and remarkable survival. The writing remains matter-of-fact about physical danger and risk, but also examines heroism, friendship and the search for meaning in life.

It is an adventure set in an age gone by, and a search for meaning that is utterly relevant today.

Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise…

“Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise; seek what they sought” Matsuo Bashō

Reading books about other people forces us to think about our relationship with those people and their actions. When people seek adventure, what are they actually searching for? And when we read their books, how should we respond? Why did, say, Joseph Banks, or Celia Fiennes, or Fridtjof Nansen live those particular lives?

The classical hero is obsessed with previous heroes – Alexander the Great wants to be Achilles, Caesar wants to be Alexander, Napoleon wants to be Caesar, and so on. They deliberately set out to be heroic. In contrast, today we say that heroes must be either accidental or victims.

If humans learn by imitation, and if there is value in challenging oneself with the lives and decisions of other people, how do we do that without just being a ludicrous? How do we avoid acting out a pastiche, and actually “…seek what they sought”? This project is partly an attempt to address these questions.

Addicted to Adventure…

Addicted to Adventure is an outstandingly interesting autobiographical account of Bob Shepton‘s sailing adventures.

The first half of Shepton’s life – Royal Marines, ordained minister, teaching at various boarding schools, years of committed rock climbing – is dealt with quickly! The bulk of the book starts after his retirement and describes his polar sailing journeys. The book’s tone is consistently optimistic, can-do and adventurous. There is a constant sense of physical limits being sought and challenged. The obvious parallel is with Bill Tilman. The book is written in a matter-of-fact style, without self-pity. It is simply an account of true adventures undertaken without one-eye on how it will subsequently look on Instagram. Highly recommended.


Intrepid Magazine…

Intrepid Magazine has been running since 2017, as a space for female voices in adventure.

It was initially a physical printed magazine, but has now moved to Substack. The printed magazine was beautiful – high quality images and production – and full of interesting stories. The online version is still full of interesting stories, and is definitely worth reading. It includes a monthly roundup of current or recent expeditions, as well as information about events and other opportunities. You can sign up so that articles are emailed directly to you.

Patrick O’Brian’s….

Patrick O’Brian’s Aubrey – Maturin series was published between 1969 and 1999. The story is set during the Napoleonic Wars, and is centred around the friendship between Jack Aubrey of the Royal Navy and Stephen Maturin, surgeon and spy.

There is high adventure, the descriptions of RN sailing vessels and life aboard are consistently accurate, and the characterisation is totally believable. It is perhaps the greatest roman fleuve written in English. Many people have admired the work, including Iris Murdoch and Jan Morris. The obvious comparison is with the Hornblower series, but the characters transcend their time and location in a way that is reminiscent of Jane Austen.